ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022
Mechanisms of Coronary Ischemia in Women.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduced retinal microvascular density in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction: A pilot study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Time Trends in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis on Sex Differences.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Position Statement on Ischemic Heart Disease - Women-Centered Health Care - 2023.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Invasive Evaluation for Coronary Vasospasm.US cardiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewObstructive coronary artery disease is a major cause of ischemia in both men and women; however, women are more likely to present with ischemia in the setting of no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), conditions that are associated with adverse cardiovascular prognosis despite absence of coronary stenosis. In this review, we focus on mechanisms of coronary ischemia that should be considered in the differential diagnosis when routine anatomic clinical investigation leads to the finding of non-obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary angiography in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. RECENT
findingsThere are multiple mechanisms that contribute to MINOCA, including atherosclerotic plaque disruption, coronary artery spasm, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), coronary embolism and/or thrombosis, and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Non-coronary causes such as myocarditis or supply-demand mismatch should also be considered on the differential when there is an unexplained troponin elevation. Use of advanced imaging and diagnostic techniques to determine the underlying etiology of MINOCA is feasible and helpful, as this has the potential to guide management and secondary prevention. Failure to identify the underlying cause(s) may result in inappropriate treatment and inaccurate counseling to patients. MINOCA predominates in young women and is associated with a guarded prognosis. The diagnosis of MINOCA should prompt further investigation to determine the underlying cause of troponin elevation. Patients with INOCA and MINOCA are heterogeneous, and response to treatments can be variable. Large randomized controlled trials to determine longer-term optimal medical therapy for management of these conditions are under investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.