ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Breast cancer patient-reported outcomes on level 1 and level 2 oncoplastic procedures using BREAST-Q
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of life after risk reducing mastectomy in a Portuguese cohort of BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant carriers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Health-related quality of life by type of breast surgery in women with primary breast cancer: prospective longitudinal cohort study.BJS open · 2024Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences Assessment in Women with Breast Cancer: Portuguese Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn breast cancer management not only mortality and surgical morbidity measurements are important but also patient satisfaction indexes. The authors evaluated the satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and breast reduction (BR) modules of BREAST-Q
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study that analyzed breast cancer patients consecutively submitted to breast surgery between January 2011 and April 2018 using two modules of BREAST-Q
resultsAmong the 232 questionnaires received, the median scores for psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being and (postoperative) satisfaction with breasts for BCT and BR modules were, respectively, 77.0 and 73.5 (p = 0.17); 62.0 and 53.0 (p = 0.14); 72.0 and 66.0 (p = 0.66). The median of adverse effects of radiation in the BCT module was 87.0. The median satisfaction with outcome in the BR module was 86.0. Both groups of patients revealed high scores of satisfaction with care. For the BCT patients, satisfaction with breasts strongly correlated with sexual well-being and was moderately correlated with psychosocial and physical well-being. For the BR patients, the satisfaction with outcome strongly correlated with satisfaction with medical team and moderately correlated with the remaining scales.
conclusionBoth oncoplastic surgery levels yielded similar satisfaction outcomes when assessed using BCT and BR modules of BREAST-Q
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.