Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904589›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

Artificial intelligence guided enhancement of digital PET: scans as fast as CT?

René Hosch, Manuel Weber, Miriam Sraieb, Nils Flaschel, Johannes Haubold, Moon-Sung Kim, Lale Umutlu, Jens Kleesiek, Ken Herrmann, Felix Nensa and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Optimizing acquisition time and injected dose inBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  3. An AI-Based Solution for Denoising Fast-Acquisition [Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical validation of a deep learning model for low-count PET image enhancement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Staging of prostate Cancer with ultra-fast PSMA-PET scans enhanced by AI.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intelligent ultrafast total-body PET for sedation-free pediatric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Generative Adversarial Network-Enhanced Ultra-Low-Dose [AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

René HoschInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. rene.hosch@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-2342
Manuel WeberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Miriam SraiebDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Nils FlaschelInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Johannes HauboldInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Moon-Sung KimInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Lale UmutluInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Jens KleesiekInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Felix NensaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Christoph RischplerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Sven KoitkaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Robert Seifert *Department of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
David Kersting *Department of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoth digital positron emission tomography (PET) detector technologies and artificial intelligence based image post-reconstruction methods allow to reduce the PET acquisition time while maintaining diagnostic quality. The aim of this study was to acquire ultra-low-count fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) ExtremePET images on a digital PET/computed tomography (CT) scanner at an acquisition time comparable to a CT scan and to generate synthetic full-dose PET images using an artificial neural network.

methodsThis is a prospective, single-arm, single-center phase I/II imaging study. A total of 587 patients were included. For each patient, a standard and an ultra-low-count FDG PET/CT scan (whole-body acquisition time about 30 s) were acquired. A modified pix2pixHD deep-learning network was trained employing 387 data sets as training and 200 as test cohort. Three models (PET-only and PET/CT with or without group convolution) were compared. Detectability and quantification were evaluated.

resultsThe PET/CT input model with group convolution performed best regarding lesion signal recovery and was selected for detailed evaluation. Synthetic PET images were of high visual image quality; mean absolute lesion SUV

conclusionLesion detectability and lesion quantification were promising in the context of extremely fast acquisition times. Possible application scenarios might include re-staging of late-stage cancer patients, in whom assessment of total tumor burden can be of higher relevance than detailed evaluation of small and low-uptake lesions.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyArtificial IntelligenceHumansPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Artificial intelligenceCTDigital PETImage post-reconstructionLow-count PETPET

Identifiers

PMID35904589
PMCPMC9606065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.