Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904575›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2023

Superior facet joint violation between open and minimally invasive techniques in lumbar fusion surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Po-Chun Liu, Yi Lu, Hsi-Hsien Lin, Yu-Cheng Yao, Ming-Chau Chang, Shih-Tien Wang, Po-Hsin Chou

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Po-Chun LiuSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi LuSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsi-Hsien LinSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yu-Cheng YaoSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Ming-Chau ChangSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Shih-Tien WangSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Po-Hsin ChouSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuperior facet joint violation (FJV) is a potential risk factor for adjacent segment disease following lumbar fusion surgery. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare screw-related superior FJV rates between the open and different minimally invasive (MI) techniques-fluoroscopy-based, 3D-image navigation, and navigation with robotic assistance-in adult lumbar fusion surgery.

methodsWe searched original articles comparing the rates of screw-related FJV between the open and different MI techniques in adult lumbar fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 2021. We compared the numbers of top-level pedicle screws and associated superior FJVs in the main analyses and performed subgroup analysis based on different MI techniques to examine whether individual MI approaches differed in superior FJV rate. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated in a random-effect meta-analysis.

resultsIncluded in the meta-analysis were 16 articles with 2655 patients and 4638 top-level pedicle screws. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in superior FJV rates between the MI and open groups (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.62-1.28). The subgroup analysis demonstrated that the overall rates of superior FJV were 27.1% (411/1518) for fluoroscopy-based, 7.1% (43/603) for 3D-image navigation, and 3.2% (7/216) for navigation with robotic assistance. Compared with the open method, the overall RRs were 1.53 (95% CI: 1.19-1.96) for fluoroscopy-based, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.22-0.75) for 3D-image navigation, and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.08-0.72) for navigation with robotic assistance.

conclusionAmong the three common MI techniques, fluoroscopy-based can be associated with a higher risk of superior FJV, while both 3D-image navigation and navigation with robotic assistance may be associated with lower risks as compared with the open method. Considering the limitations of the study, more trials are needed to prove these clinical findings.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionZygapophyseal JointAdultHumansLumbar VertebraeRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35904575
PMCPMC12755612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.