Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904572›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Postoperative imaging of the hip].

Marco Armbruster, Alexander Paulus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco ArmbrusterKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. marco.armbruster@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Alexander PaulusKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, LMU Klinikum, Campus Großhadern, München, Deutschland.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueTo assess postoperative imaging of the hip joint regarding possible complications, it is indispensable to have in-depth knowledge of commonly used surgical techniques, access routes, and the implanted materials. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsWhile radiography is used to evaluate the position of foreign material and to rule out periprosthetic fractures that have occurred intraoperatively, follow-up examinations might show signs of material failure, aseptic loosening, prosthesis infections, or the occurrence of heterotopic ossifications. If radiographic findings are ambiguous, computed tomography (CT) may be used to clarify findings, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful to identify intra- and periarticular soft tissue pathologies such as surgery-associated cartilage and ligament damage, muscle insufficiency, or metallosis. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATION AND EVALUATION: To guide clinical decision making in common postoperative complications, various classification systems are available, e.g., for periprosthetic fractures, aseptic loosening, or heterotopic ossification. However, the differentiation between aseptic material loosening and septic endoprosthesis infection remains challenging if based on imaging alone. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The assessment of postoperative hip imaging should be closely linked to the respective surgical technique and the implanted foreign material, whereby different probabilities of specific complications can be derived.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisOssification, HeterotopicPeriprosthetic FracturesHip JointHumansProsthesis FailureDiagnostic imagingHip arthroplastyHip preservation surgeryHip prothesisPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID35904572
OpenAlexW4288696152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.