Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904558›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2022

BLSSpeller to discover novel regulatory motifs in maize.

Razgar Seyed Rahmani, Dries Decap, Jan Fostier, Kathleen Marchal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Razgar Seyed RahmaniDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Dries DecapDepartment of Information Technology, IDLab, Ghent University-imec, Gent, Belgium.
Jan FostierDepartment of Information Technology, IDLab, Ghent University-imec, Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-8269
Kathleen MarchalDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2169-4588

Funding

Flanders Innovation & EntrepreneurshipFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen 3G046318Ministry of Science, Research and TechnologyUGent BOF BOF/IOP/2022/045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the decreasing cost of sequencing and availability of larger numbers of sequenced genomes, comparative genomics is becoming increasingly attractive to complement experimental techniques for the task of transcription factor (TF) binding site identification. In this study, we redesigned BLSSpeller, a motif discovery algorithm, to cope with larger sequence datasets. BLSSpeller was used to identify novel motifs in Zea mays in a comparative genomics setting with 16 monocot lineages. We discovered 61 motifs of which 20 matched previously described motif models in Arabidopsis. In addition, novel, yet uncharacterized motifs were detected, several of which are supported by available sequence-based and/or functional data. Instances of the predicted motifs were enriched around transcription start sites and contained signatures of selection. Moreover, the enrichment of the predicted motif instances in open chromatin and TF binding sites indicates their functionality, supported by the fact that genes carrying instances of these motifs were often found to be co-expressed and/or enriched in similar GO functions. Overall, our study unveiled several novel candidate motifs that might help our understanding of the genotype to phenotype association in crops.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisZea maysAlgorithmsBinding SitesGenomicsNucleotide MotifsProtein Bindingcis-elementscomparative genomicsde novo motif discoveryZea mays

Identifiers

PMID35904558
PMCPMC9358016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.