Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904529›Full record

SynthesisPharmaceutical medicine2022

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Maribel Salas, Jan Petracek, Priyanka Yalamanchili, Omar Aimer, Dinesh Kasthuril, Sameer Dhingra, Toluwalope Junaid, Tina Bostic

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. How is AI developing in pharmacovigilance?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maribel SalasDaiichi Sankyo, Inc. & Center for Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Therapeutics (CREST), University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 211 Mount Airy Rd, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5634-1558
Jan PetracekInstitute of Pharmacovigilance, Hvezdova 2b, 14000, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0806-0879
Priyanka YalamanchiliDaiichi Sankyo, Inc. & Rutgers University, 211 Mount Airy Rd, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA. pyalamanchi@dsi.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5290-8665
Omar AimerInnovigilance, Laval, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-486X
Dinesh KasthurilLabcorp Drug Development, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Sameer DhingraDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2537-8889
Toluwalope JunaidSyneos Health, Morrisville, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3097-4159
Tina BosticPPD, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7358-851X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionArtificial intelligence through machine learning uses algorithms and prior learnings to make predictions. Recently, there has been interest to include more artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance of products already in the market and pharmaceuticals in development.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and describe the uses of artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance through a systematic literature review.

methodsEmbase and MEDLINE database searches were conducted for articles published from January 1, 2015 to July 9, 2021 using search terms such as 'pharmacovigilance,' 'patient safety,' 'artificial intelligence,' and 'machine learning' in the title or abstract. Scientific articles that contained information on the use of artificial intelligence in all modalities of patient safety or pharmacovigilance were reviewed and synthesized using a pre-specified data extraction template. Articles with incomplete information and letters to editor, notes, and commentaries were excluded.

resultsSixty-six articles were identified for evaluation. Most relevant articles on artificial intelligence focused on machine learning, and it was used in patient safety in the identification of adverse drug events (ADEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (57.6%), processing safety reports (21.2%), extraction of drug-drug interactions (7.6%), identification of populations at high risk for drug toxicity or guidance for personalized care (7.6%), prediction of side effects (3.0%), simulation of clinical trials (1.5%), and integration of prediction uncertainties into diagnostic classifiers to increase patient safety (1.5%). Artificial intelligence has been used to identify safety signals through automated processes and training with machine learning models; however, the findings may not be generalizable given that there were different types of data included in each source.

conclusionArtificial intelligence allows for the processing and analysis of large amounts of data and can be applied to various disease states. The automation and machine learning models can optimize pharmacovigilance processes and provide a more efficient way to analyze information relevant to safety, although more research is needed to identify if this optimization has an impact on the quality of safety analyses. It is expected that its use will increase in the near future, particularly with its role in the prediction of side effects and ADRs.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.