Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904469›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022

Outcomes of in-vitro fertilization after bariatric surgery: a national register-based case-control study.

E Nilsson-Condori, K Mattsson, A Thurin-Kjellberg, J L Hedenbro, B Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E Nilsson-CondoriCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4741-5305
K MattssonFaculty of Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9850-5888
A Thurin-KjellbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg and Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J L HedenbroFaculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Lund, Department of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
B FribergFaculty of Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes previous bariatric surgery (BS) in women affect cumulative live birth rate in IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women having had BS seem to have the same cumulative live birth rate as non-operated women of the same BMI at IVF treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Because of the perinatal risks of obesity to mother and infant as well as impaired outcomes of IVF, obese women are advised to reduce their weight, but it is not clear whether previous BS could affect IVF results. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This national register-based case-control study included all cases of BS (n = 30 436) undergoing IVF (n = 153) from 2007 until 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsSwedish women between 18 and 45 years operated with BS, with at least one first started cycle of IVF after surgery, were included. For each woman having IVF after BS (n = 153), up to five non-operated control women (n = 744) starting their first IVF cycle during the study period were matched for age, parity and BMI at treatment. The primary outcome in this study was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) after the first IVF cycle, defined as all live births after the first cycle including fresh and frozen embryo transfers. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no significant difference in CLBR between the BS group and the matched controls (29.4% compared to 33.1%), even though the number of retrieved oocytes (7.6 vs 8.9, P = 0.005) and frozen embryos (1.0 vs 1.5, P = 0.041) were significantly fewer in the BS group. There was no association between cumulative live birth and BS, adjusted odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI (0.73, 1.51). However, the birth weight was significantly lower in the children born to mothers with previous BS, mean (SD) 3190 (690) vs 3478 (729) g, P = 0.037. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Confounders such as age, BMI and previous childbirth were accounted for by the matching design of the study, but there were no data on indication for IVF, anti-Müllerian hormone, smoking or previous comorbidities. The study was exploratory and did not reach sufficient power to detect potential smaller differences in live birth rates. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe findings concur with those in previously published smaller studies and provide somewhat reassuring results considering IVF outcomes after BS with a CLBR comparable to that of controls, despite a lower mean birth weight. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was funded by grants from the Southern Health Care Region of Sweden. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Anti-Mullerian HormoneBariatric SurgeryBirth RateBirth WeightCase-Control StudiesFemaleFertilizationFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesAnti-Mullerian HormoneARTbariatric surgeryfertilityinfertilityIVFobesity

Identifiers

PMID35904469
PMCPMC9527453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.