Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35904467›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2022

Ecological constraints on highly evolvable olfactory receptor genes and morphology in neotropical bats.

Laurel R Yohe, Matteo Fabbri, Daniela Lee, Kalina T J Davies, Thomas P Yohe, Miluska K R Sánchez, Edgardo M Rengifo, Ronald P Hall, Gregory Mutumi, Brandon P Hedrick and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Disparity of turbinal bones in placental mammals.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  2. The olfactory bulb endocast as a proxy for mammalian olfaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Laurel R YoheDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1567-8749
Matteo FabbriDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1257-1594
Daniela LeeDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1057-5380
Kalina T J DaviesSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4258-4775
Thomas P YoheIndependent Software Engineer, Centerville, OH, USA.
Miluska K R SánchezEscuela Profesional de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura, 20004, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-5788
Edgardo M RengifoPrograma de Pós-Graduação Interunidades em Ecologia Aplicada, Escola Superior de Agricultura 'Luiz de Queiroz', Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, 13416-970, Brazil.
Ronald P HallSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, California, 95344, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3467-361X
Gregory MutumiSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, California, 95344, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-2232
Brandon P HedrickDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4446-3405
Alexa SadierDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-3714
Nancy B SimmonsDepartment of Mammalogy, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, 10024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-7499
Karen E SearsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-9602
Elizabeth DumontSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, California, 95344, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7809-388X
Stephen J RossiterSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3881-4515
Bhart-Anjan S BhullarDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0838-8068
Liliana M DávalosDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-7697
Planetary Science Institute · USUniversity of California, Merced · USQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USAmerican Museum of Natural History · USCornell University · USOldham Council · GBStony Brook University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidad Nacional de Piura · PEUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although evolvability of genes and traits may promote specialization during species diversification, how ecology subsequently restricts such variation remains unclear. Chemosensation requires animals to decipher a complex chemical background to locate fitness-related resources, and thus the underlying genomic architecture and morphology must cope with constant exposure to a changing odorant landscape; detecting adaptation amidst extensive chemosensory diversity is an open challenge. In phyllostomid bats, an ecologically diverse clade that evolved plant visiting from a presumed insectivorous ancestor, the evolution of novel food detection mechanisms is suggested to be a key innovation, as plant-visiting species rely strongly on olfaction, supplementarily using echolocation. If this is true, exceptional variation in underlying olfactory genes and phenotypes may have preceded dietary diversification. We compared olfactory receptor (OR) genes sequenced from olfactory epithelium transcriptomes and olfactory epithelium surface area of bats with differing diets. Surprisingly, although OR evolution rates were quite variable and generally high, they are largely independent of diet. Olfactory epithelial surface area, however, is relatively larger in plant-visiting bats and there is an inverse relationship between OR evolution rates and surface area. Relatively larger surface areas suggest greater reliance on olfactory detection and stronger constraint on maintaining an already diverse OR repertoire. Instead of the typical case in which specialization and elaboration are coupled with rapid diversification of associated genes, here the relevant genes are already evolving so quickly that increased reliance on smell has led to stabilizing selection, presumably to maintain the ability to consistently discriminate among specific odorants-a potential ecological constraint on sensory evolution.

Indexed as

ChiropteraReceptors, OdorantAnimalsGenomePhylogenySmellReceptors, OdorantChemosensationevolvabilitygene familymorphologyolfaction

Identifiers

PMID35904467
OpenAlexW4288715232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.