Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35903894›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2022

Neuropsychological effects of COVID-19: A review.

Giuseppa Maresca, Desiree Latella, Lara Carnazza, Francesco Corallo, Caterina Formica

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giuseppa MarescaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Desiree LatellaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Lara CarnazzaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Francesco CoralloIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Caterina FormicaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this review is to examine review literature on the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsStudies were identified by an online search of the PubMed database. We selected studies published from January to May 2020 (during the COVID-19 emergency).

resultsWe found that psychological effects of COVID-19 remain serious among the most of the population, in particular for people with mental disorders, adolescents, healthcare workers, and the general population that experienced high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms, with possible long-term psychological implications.

conclusionFindings revealed that living in urban areas, having economic stability, and living with parents were protective factors against anxiety for youth groups, whereas a risk factor was represented by the presence of COVID-19 infection that involved family members.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAnxietyDepressionHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19emergency psychologyemotional epidemiologymental healthpsychological intervention

Identifiers

PMID35903894
PMCPMC9353421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.