Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35903751›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Survey of the American Glaucoma Society Membership on Current Glaucoma Drainage Device Placement and Postoperative Corticosteroid Use.

Sean Yonamine, Lauren Ton, Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer, Gui-Shuang Ying, Iqbal Ike K Ahmed, Teresa C Chen, Asher Weiner, Steven J Gedde, Ying Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean Yonamine *Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8002-7104
Lauren Ton *School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-2706
Jennifer Rose-NussbaumerStanford Byers Eye Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Gui-Shuang YingCenter for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Iqbal Ike K AhmedPrism Eye Institute, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Teresa C ChenMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Asher WeinerUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Steven J GeddeBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ying HanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USPrism Eye Institute · CASmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess practice patterns and opinions of glaucoma specialists regarding glaucoma drainage device tube shunt placement and post-operative anti-inflammatory medication use. We also assess the perceived need for a randomized control trial to compare them. Patients and Methods: An online survey was distributed to a group of glaucoma specialists from the American Glaucoma Society via the American Glaucoma Society forum from April to August 2021. Results: One hundred and twenty-eight responses were included. Ninety percent placed tubes in the anterior chamber. Sixty-one percent reported that evidence suggested the superiority of sulcus tube placement over the anterior chamber, whereas 34% reported there was not enough evidence to suggest superiority of either in preventing endothelial cell loss. Comparing these techniques for intraocular pressure control, 49% reported evidence suggested sulcus tube placement superiority whereas 46% reported there was not enough evidence. Over 40% of respondents reported that they were either unfamiliar with literature or that there was not enough evidence to support the superiority of difluprednate 0.05% over prednisolone 1% for post-operative use in preventing endothelial cell loss and for intraocular pressure control. Ninety percent and 81% of respondents respectively would benefit from randomized control trials comparing outcomes of anterior chamber vs sulcus tube placement and post-operative corticosteroid usage. Conclusion: Most glaucoma specialists surveyed place glaucoma drainage device tube in the anterior chamber over the sulcus. A randomized control trial to determine optimal tube placement and post-operative anti-inflammatory medication use for preventing endothelial cell loss would change current glaucoma drainage device practice patterns.

Indexed as

endothelial cell lossglaucoma drainage devicesulcus

Identifiers

PMID35903751
PMCPMC9317359
OpenAlexW4286260659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.