Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35903643›Full record

ReviewTobacco induced diseases2022

Association between smoking and risk of death in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nai Zhang, Yujuan Liu, Chuang Yang, Peng Zeng, Tao Gong, Lu Tao, Xinai Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tobacco induced diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nai ZhangDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Yujuan LiuDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Chuang YangDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Peng ZengDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Tao GongDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Lu TaoDepartment of Emergency, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Xinai LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough some research papers have suggested that smoking may increase mortality in patients with sepsis, no evidence has been produced in this regard. This systematic research evaluated the risk of death in patients with sepsis who were smokers to facilitate better clinical decision making.

methodsThis is a systematic review registered in PROPERO (CRD42022296654). Searches were conducted to identify suitable studies from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials from January 1980 to June 2021. Two independent reviewers screened the articles using keywords and extracted the data. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The primary endpoints included the mortality of patients with sepsis.

resultsFive studies involving 2694 participants were included in our study. Among the five included articles, three studies had an NOS score of 6, while the other two had an NOS score of 7. The results showed that a significantly higher risk of death was observed in smokers with sepsis compared with non-smokers with sepsis (hazard ratio, HR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.11-2.37, p=0.01). Among the patients followed for more than 2 months, the mortality rate of smokers was significantly higher (2.33 times) than that of non-smokers (HR=2.33; 95% CI: 1.83-2.96, p<0.01). The difference in mortality did not reach statistical significance when the follow-up period was shorter than 2 months (HR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.96-1.56, p=0.10).

conclusionsSmoking increased mortality in patients with sepsis when the follow-up period was longer than 2 months.

Indexed as

follow-up periodmeta-analysismortalitysepsissmoking

Identifiers

PMID35903643
PMCPMC9284521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.