ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2022
An analysis of the significance of the lymph node ratio and extracapsular involvement in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The prognostic values of lymph node ratio for gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The primary aim of our study was to analyse the impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and extracapsular involvement (ECI) on the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Material and methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 886 patients surgically treated for EC between 2000 and 2015. In the subgroup of patients with lymph node metastases (LNM), we evaluated the impact of the number and localization of the LNM, LNR, and ECI on patients' overall survival (OS). Results: In the group of patients with LNM, 0.3 was the optimal LNR cut-off for differentiating between short- and long-term survivors [HR = 2.94 (95% CI: 1.49-5.80)]. Patients with a LNR ≥ 0.3 had a significantly shorter OS period (35.0 months, range 0.2-175 months) compared to patients with a LNR < 0.3 [median OS - mOS, was 143, range 15-169 months; ( Conclusions: Our results suggest that when LNM are found, the long-term outcomes of EC patients are worse in those who have a LNR ≥ 0.3, the presence of ECI, and a more advanced extension of the primary tumour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.