Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35903208›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2022

Quantitative analysis of plasma DNA in anal cancer patients.

Ewa Małusecka, Monika Giglok, Rafał Suwiński, Tomasz Wojciech Rutkowski, Agnieszka Maria Mazurek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ewa MałuseckaCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Monika GiglokRadiotherapy Clinic and Teaching Hospital, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Rafał SuwińskiRadiotherapy Clinic and Teaching Hospital, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Tomasz Wojciech RutkowskiIst Radiation and Clinical Oncology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Agnieszka Maria MazurekCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLNational Institute of Oncology · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The availability and non-invasiveness of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) opens up new possibilities for real-time serial testing. The relationship between cfDNA concentration, clinical factors and suitability for monitoring was analyzed in patients with newly diagnosed anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Material and methods: Blood samples were collected at several points during and after treatment. Patients were homogeneously treated with chemoradiotherapy. Results: The concentration of cfDNA strongly correlated with the tumor volume ( Conclusions: Substantial changes in plasma cfDNA content can be observed after chemoradiotherapy for ASCC. However, the small number of cases studied makes it difficult to assess the usefulness of the cfDNA test.

Indexed as

anal cancercirculating cell-free DNAplasmaradiochemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35903208
PMCPMC9319180
OpenAlexW4285743378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.