ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2022
An Efficient Modern Strategy to Screen Drug Candidates Targeting RdRp of SARS-CoV-2 With Potentially High Selectivity and Specificity.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Materials discovery with extreme propertiesChemical science · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing GPCR-ligand predictions: DeepGPCR with experimental validation for high-precision drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- DeepBindGCN: Integrating Molecular Vector Representation with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Protein-Ligand Interaction Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The pharmacology and mechanisms of platycodin D, an active triterpenoid saponin fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Desired drug candidates should have both a high potential binding chance and high specificity. Recently, many drug screening strategies have been developed to screen compounds with high possible binding chances or high binding affinity. However, there is still no good solution to detect whether those selected compounds possess high specificity. Here, we developed a reverse DFCNN (Dense Fully Connected Neural Network) and a reverse docking protocol to check a given compound's ability to bind diversified targets and estimate its specificity with homemade formulas. We used the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) target as a proof-of-concept example to identify drug candidates with high selectivity and high specificity. We first used a previously developed hybrid screening method to find drug candidates from an 8888-size compound database. The hybrid screening method takes advantage of the deep learning-based method, traditional molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and binding free energy calculated by metadynamics, which should be powerful in selecting high binding affinity candidates. Also, we integrated the reverse DFCNN and reversed docking against a diversified 102 proteins to the pipeline for assessing the specificity of those selected candidates, and finally got compounds that have both predicted selectivity and specificity. Among the eight selected candidates, Platycodin D and Tubeimoside III were confirmed to effectively inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.