Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35903184›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2022

Patient involvement in clinical trials.

Jan Geißler, Emily Isham, Gary Hickey, Clive Ballard, Anne Corbett, Cheryl Lubbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lack of Patient and Public Involvement Reporting in Allergy Prevention Trials: The Example of Complementary Feeding.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Driving emerging technology to clinical impact.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Collaborative Efforts in Pediatric Surgery: Lessons from European Randomized Controlled Trials.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jan GeißlerThe Patvocates Network, Munich, Germany.
Emily IshamRare Cancers Australia, Bowral, NSW Australia.
Gary HickeyNational Institute for Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Clive BallardUniversity of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine & Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Anne CorbettUniversity of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine & Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Cheryl LubbertReverba, Seattle, WA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials are required to ensure new treatments are safe and effective for patients. The involvement of participants in the planning and execution of clinical trials is critical not only to their success but also so that the participating communities can benefit from them.

Indexed as

Clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID35903184
PMCPMC9314383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.