ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Objective Observer vs. Patient Motor State Assessments Using the PD Home Diary in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motor Efficacy of Subcutaneous DIZ102, Intravenous DIZ101 or Intestinal Levodopa/Carbidopa Infusion.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Trial
- Walking Capacity in Parkinson's Disease: Test-Retest Reliability of the 6-min Walk Test on a Non-Linear Circuit.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Detecting Freezing of Gait in Parkinson Disease Using Multiple Wearable Sensors Sets During Various Walking Tasks Relative to Medication Conditions (DetectFoG): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Improving Parkinson's disease management through wearable technology: A cost-benefit perspective.PloS one · 2025Article
- Safinamide as an adjunct to levodopa monotherapy in Asian patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing early wearing-off: a pooled analysis of the J-SILVER and KEEP studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- [Commercial devices for monitoring symptoms in Parkinson's disease: benefits, limitations and trends].Revista de neurologia · 2024Review
- Evaluation of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease: electronic vs. conventional paper diaries.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Pain Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease and Their Association with Motor and Non-Motor Fluctuations.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Observational
- Commercial symptom monitoring devices in Parkinson's disease: benefits, limitations, and trends.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Application of single wrist-wearable accelerometry for objective motor diary assessment in fluctuating Parkinson's disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Improving naturalistic neuroscience with patient engagement strategies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Validation of the PD home diary for assessment of motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Parkinson Disease (PD) Home Diary (HD) is a commonly used clinical outcome measure, but it has not been extensively compared to direct assessments by experienced observers. Objective: Validation of patient-reported HD by investigating the agreement between motor state assessments by patients and observers. Methods: This observational study included patients with PD and motor fluctuations. Observers were physicians or research nurses. Patients completed a screening visit, one day of diary ratings at home, and then two days of ratings on-site during which patients and observers simultaneously judged the participants' motor state. Results: Observers and 40 patients completed 1,288 pairs of half-hourly blinded motor state assessments. There were significant differences between observer and patient ratings ( Conclusion: There were significant differences between observer and patient ratings. Patients and observers generally agreed on when the patients was in the "On" state (with or without dyskinesia). Patient ratings on the hour level seem to be influenced by other aspects of the patients' experience than the observed motor state, but assessment of daily time spent in the different motor state provides reasonable reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.