ArticleKorean journal of family medicine2022
Analysis of Continuity of Care and Its Related Factors in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Korean journal of family medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association between a structured training programme and self-reported clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes management in primary care.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evidence of Overlapping Roles Between Clinics and Hospitals in Primary Care.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Continuity of Care Strategies for Enhancing Diabetes Self-Management in Older Adults in Asian Countries.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluating the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on hypertension and diabetes care in South Korea: an interrupted time series analysis.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Article
- COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the continuity of care for chronic patients: evidence from a cross-sectional retrospective study in a developing country.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- The Role of Continuity of Care in the Management of Chronic Disease.Korean journal of family medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContinuity of care in primary care settings is crucial for managing diabetes. We aimed to statistically define and analyze continuity factors associated with demographics, clinical workforce, and geographical relationships.
methodsWe used 2014-2015 National Health Insurance Service claims data from the Korean registry, with 39,096 eligible outpatient attendance. We applied multivariable logistic regression to analyze factors that may affect the continuity of care indices for each patient: the most frequent provider continuity index (MFPCI), modified-modified continuity index (MMCI), and continuity of care index (COCI).
resultsThe mean continuity of care indices were 0.90, 0.96, and 0.85 for MFPCI, MMCI and COCI, respectively. Among patient factors, old age >80 years (MFPCI: odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.89; MMCI: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92; and COCI: OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74-0.89) and mild disability were strongly associated with lower continuity of care. Another significant factor was the residential area: the farther the patients lived from their primary care clinic, the lower the continuity of diabetes care (MFPCI: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.78; MMCI: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.73; and COCI: OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.78).
conclusionThe geographical proximity of patients' residential areas and clinic locations showed the strongest correlation as a continuity factor. Further efforts are needed to improve continuity of care to address the geographical imbalance in diabetic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.