Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902950›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Factors contributing to 1-year dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a nomogram prediction model.

Mieralimu Muertizha, XinTian Cai, Baochao Ji, Abudousaimi Aimaiti, Li Cao

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. A clinical risk score enables early prediction of dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mieralimu MuertizhaDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137th South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
XinTian CaiXinjiang Medical University Urumqi, People's Republic of China, 137th South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Baochao JiDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137th South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Abudousaimi AimaitiDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137th South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Li CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137th South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China. xjbone@sina.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying risk factors and early intervention are critical for improving the satisfaction rate of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aimed to identify patient-specific variables and establish a nomogram model to predict dissatisfaction at 1 year after TKA.

methodsThis prospective cohort study involved 208 consecutive primary TKA patients with end-stage arthritis who completed self-reported measures preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. All participants were randomized into a training cohort (n = 154) and validation cohort (n = 54). Multiple regression models with preoperative and postoperative factors were used to establish the nomogram model for dissatisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to screen the suitable and effective risk factors (demographic variables, preoperative variables, surgical variable, and postoperative variables) collected. These variables were compared between the satisfied and dissatisfied groups in the training cohort. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis were used to validate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the model. Results were evaluated by internal validation of the validation cohort.

resultsThe overall satisfaction rate 1 year after TKA was 77.8%. The nomogram prediction model included the following risk factors: gender; primary diagnosis; postoperative residual pain; poor postoperative range of motion; wound healing; and the rate of change in the degree of coronal lower limb alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA).The ROC curves of the training and validation cohorts were 0.9206 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8785-0.9627) and 0.9662 (0.9231, 1.0000) (95% CI, 0.9231, 1.0000), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good calibration of the nomogram (training cohort, p = 0.218; validation cohort, p = 0.103).

conclusionThis study developed a prediction nomogram model based on partially modifiable risk factors for predicting dissatisfaction 1 year after TKA. This model demonstrated good discriminative capacity for identifying those at greatest risk for dissatisfaction and may help surgeons and patients identify and evaluate the risk factors for dissatisfaction and optimize TKA outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansNomogramsPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainProspective StudiesCoronal alignmentNomogramPatient satisfactionTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35902950
PMCPMC9330701
OpenAlexW4288080961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.