Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022
Factors contributing to 1-year dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a nomogram prediction model.
Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of machine learning in identifying candidates for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- What's important for recovery after a total knee replacement? A systematic review of mixed methods studies.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of early hybrid assistive limb assisted rehabilitation on functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Trial
- Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: accuracy, clinical outcomes, complications, learning curve and cost-effectiveness: a critical clinical review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Effects of Training with Hybrid Assistive Device on Motor Unit Behavior After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Evidence on PROMs, Functional Outcomes, Neuromotor Recovery, and Complications-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Rotational alignment of the native knee joint using magnetic resonance imaging compared to current optimal angles in total knee replacement.Journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Cost-analysis of total knee arthroplasty with robot-assisted surgery versus conventional approach.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Full-Process Automatic CPAK Classification System and Its Application in the Analysis of Alignment Outcomes Before and After Knee Arthroplasty.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical and mechanical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of 163,516 patients.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Does surgeon handedness affect the outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective cohort study.World journal of orthopedics · 2026Article
- Assessing the Ability of an Online Education Program to Modify Patient Expectations of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Preserving joint line orientation in TKA improves short- to mid-term outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Healthcare resource utilization for VELYS™ robotic-assisted solution compared to manual surgery for total knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- "Neutral Satisfied" Patients Should Not Be Dichotomized to "Satisfied" or "Dissatisfied" in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting a forgotten joint in patients one year after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- The Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline: MATLAB-based model personalization and treatment optimization functionality for OpenSim.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Computed tomography radiomics in predicting patient satisfaction after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Observational
- A clinical risk score enables early prediction of dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying risk factors and early intervention are critical for improving the satisfaction rate of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aimed to identify patient-specific variables and establish a nomogram model to predict dissatisfaction at 1 year after TKA.
methodsThis prospective cohort study involved 208 consecutive primary TKA patients with end-stage arthritis who completed self-reported measures preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. All participants were randomized into a training cohort (n = 154) and validation cohort (n = 54). Multiple regression models with preoperative and postoperative factors were used to establish the nomogram model for dissatisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to screen the suitable and effective risk factors (demographic variables, preoperative variables, surgical variable, and postoperative variables) collected. These variables were compared between the satisfied and dissatisfied groups in the training cohort. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis were used to validate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the model. Results were evaluated by internal validation of the validation cohort.
resultsThe overall satisfaction rate 1 year after TKA was 77.8%. The nomogram prediction model included the following risk factors: gender; primary diagnosis; postoperative residual pain; poor postoperative range of motion; wound healing; and the rate of change in the degree of coronal lower limb alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA).The ROC curves of the training and validation cohorts were 0.9206 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8785-0.9627) and 0.9662 (0.9231, 1.0000) (95% CI, 0.9231, 1.0000), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good calibration of the nomogram (training cohort, p = 0.218; validation cohort, p = 0.103).
conclusionThis study developed a prediction nomogram model based on partially modifiable risk factors for predicting dissatisfaction 1 year after TKA. This model demonstrated good discriminative capacity for identifying those at greatest risk for dissatisfaction and may help surgeons and patients identify and evaluate the risk factors for dissatisfaction and optimize TKA outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.