ArticleBMC cancer2022
Body mass index and serum markers associated with progression-free survival in lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic significance of the pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in colorectal cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis with 24 cohort studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic Impact of Body Mass index in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Association of body mass index and serum markers with immune-related adverse events in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Impact of baseline nutritional and inflammatory markers on safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a retrospective, monocentric study.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive value of nutritional biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- CT-based body composition and inflammatory nutritional biomarker nomogram for predicting early postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- The Impact of Body Composition on Outcomes in NSCLC Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Body Composition and Clinical Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Increased adipose tissue is associated with improved overall survival, independent of skeletal muscle mass in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Article
- Obesity and lung cancer-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- Real world prognostic utility of platelet lymphocyte ratio and nutritional status in first-line immunotherapy response in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2023Article
- A novel immune-nutritional score predicts response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Serum albumin: a pharmacokinetic marker for optimizing treatment outcome of immune checkpoint blockade.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Article
- Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) in Cancer Patients Undergoing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Disease markers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundICIs have remarkably affected the treatment strategies for numerous malignancies, including lung cancer. However, only a fraction of patients experience durable responses to ICIs; thus, there is an urgent need to identify the parameters related to ICI therapeutic effects. In this study, we investigated nutritional status surrogates and several serum markers to estimate the efficacy of ICIs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe records of 66 patients with stage III/IV lung cancer who received ICIs were retrospectively analyzed. Features of patients' clinical pathology, including age, sex, histology, line of treatment, BMI, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and serum inflammatory markers such as LMR and PLR, were examined. Progression-free survival was the primary endpoint. Relationships among categorical variables were assessed by the chi-squared test. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method followed by the log-rank test. Cox multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the association between each variable and the survival time of patients.
resultsThe patients with BMI ≥ 25 (kg/m2), serum ALB≥37 (g/dL), serum creatinine ≥61.8 (μmol/L), LMR ≥ 2.12 had a significantly prolonged PFS in comparison with BMI<25 (kg/m2), ALB<37 (g/dL), creatinine<61.8 (μmol/L), LMR<2.12 (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was detected between patients with PLR < 135 and PLR ≥ 135 (p = 0.612). Multivariate analysis revealed that ALB≥37 (g/dL) and creatinine ≥ 61.8 (μmol/L) were associated with prolonged PFS, while statistical significance was not achieved in the BMI groups.
conclusionsThe current results indicated that high BMI is related to longer PFS in lung cancer patients treated with ICIs, which may be correlated with high levels of serum albumin and creatinine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.