Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902828›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

Clinical performance of quantitative PCR for the molecular identification of skeletal tuberculosis from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Gang He, Chun-Yu Chen, Xin Zhang, Pei-Pei Ding, Chang-Zheng Hu, Xiu-Fang Huang, Xian Zhang, Xu Gong, Pei-Lin Zhen, Liang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tuberculosis of Rib: Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Coccidioidomycosis Osteoarticular Dissemination.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gang HeDepartment of Infection, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, China.
Chun-Yu ChenDepartment of Infection, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524000, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Science and Education, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, Guangdong, China.
Pei-Pei DingDepartment of Science and Education, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, Guangdong, China.
Chang-Zheng HuDepartment of Science and Education, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, Guangdong, China.
Xiu-Fang HuangDepartment of Science and Education, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, Guangdong, China.
Xian ZhangDepartment of Infection, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524000, China.
Xu GongDepartment of Infection, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524000, China.
Pei-Lin ZhenDepartment of Science and Education, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, Guangdong, China. 1004588059@qq.com.
Liang ZhangTranslational Medicine Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400, China. zhangliang1999@tsinghua.org.cn.
Jiangmen Central Hospital · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNGuangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, skeletal tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis is mostly by histopathology, but the positivity rate is low. There is a need to develop new methods for the molecular identification of this disorder. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical utility of quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based diagnosis of skeletal TB from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and its comparative evaluation with acid-fast bacillus staining (AFS).

methodsWe detected Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis/MTB) DNA using qPCR and AFS in FFPE tissue samples from 129 patients suspected of having skeletal TB. The sensitivity, specificity as well as area under the curve (AUC) of qPCR and AFS were calculated. Meanwhile, some factors potentially affecting qPCR and AFS results were investigated.

resultsOverall, qPCR outperformed AFS in detecting M. tuberculosis. The AUC of qPCR was higher than that of AFS (0.744 vs.0.561, p < 0.001). Furthermore, decalcification of bone tissues did not affect the sensitivity and specificity of qPCR tests. Whereas it impacted the performance of AFS, decalcification increased AFS's specificity and decreased its sensitivity (p < 0.05). Moreover, qPCR had a significantly larger AUC than AFS in decalcified and non-decalcified groups (0.735/0.756 vs. 0.582/0.534, p < 0.001) respectively. Similarly, the AUC of PCR was more extensive than that of AFS regardless of skeletal TB patients with concomitant pulmonary TB or not (0.929 vs. 0.762; 0.688 vs. 0.524, p < 0.01).

conclusionsOur data demonstrate that qPCR offers superior accuracy for the detection of mycobacteria in FFPE tissues compared to traditional AFS, indicating its clinical value in osteoarticular TB diagnosis.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis, Lymph NodeFormaldehydeHumansParaffin EmbeddingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityFormaldehydeAcid fast stainingparaffin specimenqPCRSkeletal tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35902828
PMCPMC9331151
OpenAlexW4288074320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.