ArticleScientific reports2022
Synthesis of innovative triphenylamine-functionalized organic photosensitizers outperformed the benchmark dye N719 for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-efficiency tandem DSSCs based on tailored naphthalene sensitizers for indoor DSSC efficiency above 25.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Triphenylamine-Based Metal-Free Organic Dyes as Co-Sensitizers: Enhancing Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Performance Through Innovative Molecular Design.Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential of biphenylamine- and triphenylamine-based sensitizers for enhanced efficiency of more than 8% in dye-sensitized solar cells.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Novel phenothiazine-based sensitizers for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells: enhanced photovoltaic properties through strategic Co-sensitization with N719.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Tandem dye-sensitized solar cells achieve 12.89% efficiency using novel organic sensitizers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein, we present a thorough photovoltaic investigation of four triphenylamine organic sensitizers with D-π-A configurations and compare their photovoltaic performances to the conventional ruthenium-based sensitizer N719. SFA-5-8 are synthesized and utilized as sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) applications. The effects of the donor unit (triphenylamine), π-conjugation bridge (thiophene ring), and various acceptors (phenylacetonitrile and 2-cyanoacetamide derivatives) were investigated. Moreover, this was asserted by profound calculations of HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) energy levels, the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), and natural bond orbital (NBO) that had been studied for the TPA-sensitizers. Theoretical density functional theory (DFT) was performed to study the distribution of electron density between donor and acceptor moieties. The sensitization by the absorption of sensitizers SFA-5-8 leads to an obvious enhancement in the visible light absorption (300-750 nm) as well as a higher photovoltaic efficiency in the range of (5.53-7.56%). Under optimized conditions, SFA-7 showed outstanding sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.