ArticleScientific reports2022
Interpersonal neural synchrony when predicting others' actions during a game of rock-paper-scissors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-dependent increases and decreases of BOLD signal in theory of mind brain regions during strategic social interaction.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Article
- When robots reshape teams: neurodynamic insights into taskwork and teamwork in search and rescue.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Article
- Mother-Child Neurophysiological Synchrony Moderates the Relation Between Maternal Affect Experiences and Child Emotion Dysregulation.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025Article
- Learning with others: teacher-learner brain synchrony depends on mutual gaze and joint attention.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- The impact of alcohol on brain response in social context: A hyperscanning alcohol-administration trial.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Human intergroup coordination in a hierarchical multi-agent sensorimotor task arises from concurrent co-optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neural decoding of competitive decision-making in Rock-Paper-Scissors.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Distinct fNIRS Inter-Brain Coupling Patterns for Cooperation versus Competition in a Tennis Game.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Inhibited neural response during interpersonal conflict: insights from fNIRS hyperscanning.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Investigating short windows of interbrain synchrony: A step toward fNIRS-based hyperfeedback.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As members of a social species, we spend most of our time interacting with others. In interactions, we tend to mutually align our behavior and brain responses to communicate more effectively. In a semi-computerized version of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game, we investigated whether people show enhanced interpersonal neural synchronization when making explicit predictions about others' actions. Across four experimental conditions, we measured the dynamic brain activity using the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning method. Results showed that interpersonal neural synchrony was enhanced when participants played the game together as they would do in real life in comparison to when they played the game on their own. We found no evidence of increased neural synchrony when participants made explicit predictions about others' actions. Hence, neural synchrony may depend on mutual natural interaction rather than an explicit prediction strategy. This study is important, as it examines one of the presumed functions of neural synchronization namely facilitating predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.