Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902634›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A digital alkali spin maser.

Stuart Ingleby, Paul Griffin, Terry Dyer, Marcin Mrozowski, Erling Riis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. High-Resolution Atomic Magnetometer-Based Imaging of Integrated Circuits and Batteries.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stuart InglebyDepartment of Physics, SUPA, Strathclyde University, 107 Rottenrow East, Glasgow, G4 0NG, Lanarkshire, UK. stuart.ingleby@strath.ac.uk.
Paul GriffinDepartment of Physics, SUPA, Strathclyde University, 107 Rottenrow East, Glasgow, G4 0NG, Lanarkshire, UK.
Terry DyerDepartment of Physics, SUPA, Strathclyde University, 107 Rottenrow East, Glasgow, G4 0NG, Lanarkshire, UK.
Marcin MrozowskiDepartment of Physics, SUPA, Strathclyde University, 107 Rottenrow East, Glasgow, G4 0NG, Lanarkshire, UK.
Erling RiisDepartment of Physics, SUPA, Strathclyde University, 107 Rottenrow East, Glasgow, G4 0NG, Lanarkshire, UK.
University of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T001046/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-oscillating atomic magnetometers, in which the precession of atomic spins in a magnetic field is driven by resonant modulation, offer high sensitivity and dynamic range. Phase-coherent feedback from the detected signal to the applied modulation creates a resonant spin maser system, highly responsive to changes in the background magnetic field. Here we show a system in which the phase condition for resonant precession is met by digital signal processing integrated into the maser feedback loop. This system uses a modest chip-scale laser and mass-produced dual-pass caesium vapour cell and operates in a 50 [Formula: see text]T field, making it a suitable technology for portable measurements of the geophysical magnetic field. We demonstrate a Cramér-Rao lower bound-limited resolution of 50 fT at 1 s sampling cadence, and a sensor bandwidth of 10 kHz. This device also represents an important class of atomic system in which low-latency digital processing forms an integral part of a coherently-driven quantum system.

Identifiers

PMID35902634
PMCPMC9334639
OpenAlexW4288441228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.