Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902561›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Rates and drivers of aboveground carbon accumulation in global monoculture plantation forests.

Jacob J Bukoski, Susan C Cook-Patton, Cyril Melikov, Hongyi Ban, Jessica L Chen, Elizabeth D Goldman, Nancy L Harris, Matthew D Potts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seed dispersal disruption limits tropical forest regrowth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Forestation at the right time with the right species can generate persistent carbon benefits in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacob J BukoskiConservation International, Arlington, VA, USA. jbukoski@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-5023
Susan C Cook-PattonThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-4397
Cyril MelikovDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Hongyi BanDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9004-7651
Jessica L ChenDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-9540
Elizabeth D GoldmanWorld Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Nancy L HarrisWorld Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-4249
Matthew D PottsDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7442-3944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoring forest cover is a key action for mitigating climate change. Although monoculture plantations dominate existing commitments to restore forest cover, we lack a synthetic view of how carbon accumulates in these systems. Here, we assemble a global database of 4756 field-plot measurements from monoculture plantations across all forested continents. With these data, we model carbon accumulation in aboveground live tree biomass and examine the biological, environmental, and human drivers that influence this growth. Our results identify four-fold variation in carbon accumulation rates across tree genera, plant functional types, and biomes, as well as the key mediators (e.g., genus of tree, endemism of species, prior land use) of variation in these rates. Our nonlinear growth models advance our understanding of carbon accumulation in forests relative to mean annual rates, particularly during the next few decades that are critical for mitigating climate change.

Indexed as

CarbonForestsBiomassClimate ChangeHumansTreesCarbon

Identifiers

PMID35902561
PMCPMC9334591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.