Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902489›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

Emergency colectomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis: a nationwide survey on technical strategies of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR).

Michela Mineccia, Serena Perotti, Gianluca Pellino, Gianluca Matteo Sampietro, Valerio Celentano, Rodolfo Rocca, Marco Daperno, Alessandro Ferrero

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Michela MinecciaDepartment of Chirurgia Generale E Oncologica, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Turin, Italy. mmineccia@mauriziano.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7363-8609
Serena PerottiDepartment of Chirurgia Generale E Oncologica, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Turin, Italy.
Gianluca PellinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, "Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Gianluca Matteo SampietroDivision of Surgery, ASST Rhodense, Rho Memorial Hospital, 20017, Milan, Italy.
Valerio CelentanoChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rodolfo RoccaDepartment of Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Turin, Italy.
Marco DapernoDepartment of Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro FerreroDepartment of Chirurgia Generale E Oncologica, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Turin, Italy.
Ospedale Garibaldi · ITA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBHebron University · PS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency subtotal colectomy is the standard treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) unresponsive to medical treatment. No guidelines are available about surgical technique. The aim of the current survey was to identify the attitudes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgeons concerning colectomy in patients with ASUC by means of a nationwide survey, with specific focus on intraoperative technical details. A survey was developed with focus on number of procedures performed, approach to vascular ligation, technique of bowel dissection, treatment of the omentum and of the rectal stump. Twenty Centres completed the survey. Seventy percent of responders started the colectomy laparoscopically. No significant differences were observed about vessels and mesocolic dissection as well as on the choice of the starting colon side and management of the omentum. Ileocolic vessels were ligated distally by 70% and at the origin by 30% and those who transect mesenteric vessels distally are significatively more likely to perform the dissection from lateral to medial and to cut the middle colic vessels distally and 100% of the ones linking left vessels at mesenteric axis transect middle colic vessels at the origin. No differences were observed in the treatment of rectal stump; however, all surgeons who performed a transrectal drainage (45%) left the rectal stump intraperitoneal (p < 0.05). No consensus exists about the technique of dissection, vascular ligation, treatment of the omentum and management of rectal stump. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the different surgical techniques on patients' outcomes.

Indexed as

ColicColitis, UlcerativeColorectal SurgeryMesocolonColectomyHumansAcute severe ulcerative colitisEmergency colectomyInflammatory bowel diseaseLaparoscopyOperative guidelines

Identifiers

PMID35902489
OpenAlexW4288439826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.