ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Cerebellum and Emotion Memory.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Striatal and cerebellar interactions during reward-based motor performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging and Emotional Development in the Pediatric Population: Understanding the Link Between the Brain, Emotions, and Behavior.Pediatric reports · 2025Review
- Striatal and cerebellar interactions during reward-based motor performance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Inflammation/NF-κB and BDNF/TrkB/CREB Pathways in the Cerebellum Are Implicated in the Changes in Spatial Working Memory After Both Morphine Dependence and Withdrawal in Rat.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Article
- Effect of Enriched Environment on Cerebellum and Social Behavior of Valproic Zebrafish.NeuroSci · 2024Article
- Mild Deficits in Fear Learning: Evidence from Humans and Mice with Cerebellar Cortical Degeneration.eNeuro · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fear is an important emotion for survival, and the cerebellum has been found to contribute not only to innate affective and defensive behavior, but also to learned fear responses. Acquisition and retention of fear conditioned bradycardia and freezing have been shown to depend on the integrity of the cerebellar vermis in rodents. There is a considerable number of brain imaging studies, which observe activation of the human cerebellum in fear conditioning paradigms. Different to what one may expect based on the initial cerebellar lesion studies, activations related to the learned prediction of threat go well beyond the vermis, and are most prominent in the lateral cerebellum. Different parts of the cerebellum likely contribute to learning of autonomic, motor, emotional and cognitive responses involved in classical fear conditioning. The neural operation which is performed in the various parts of the cerebellum is frequently assumed to be the same. One hypothesis is that the cerebellum acts as, or is part of, a predictive device. More recent findings will be discussed that the cerebellum may not only be involved in the processing of sensory prediction errors, but also in the processing of reward and reward prediction errors, which may play a central role in emotions and emotional learning. Current knowledge about the intrinsic learning mechanisms underlying fear memory in the cerebellum, and its connections with subcortical and cortical fear circuitry will be presented. The chapter will conclude with a discussion on how disordered cerebellar fear learning may contribute to affective disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.