Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902462›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Principles of Brain and Emotion: Beyond the Cortico-Centric Bias.

Marine Thomasson, Julie Péron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marine ThomassonClinical and Experimental Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Julie PéronClinical and Experimental Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. julie.peron@unige.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective neurosciences have largely contributed to the elaboration of theoretical and neuroanatomical models through research conducted in non-primate animals and human beings. However, for methodological and historical reasons, knowledge has developed by focusing mainly on the cerebral cortex, resulting in a lack of investigations of the functional aspects of subcortical structures such as the cerebellum and the basal ganglia. The close anatomical connections revealed between these two structures, as well as their reciprocal connections with the cerebral cortex, lead to a vertically organized model of the brain. Both the cerebellum and the basal ganglia are involved in the different components required during an emotional episode. Their respective specificity in the analysis of temporal patterns contributes to the optimal processing of emotional signals such as those that can be conveyed by the voice (emotional prosody). Internal temporally structured event representation, built from the salient modulation extractions performed by the cerebellum, is used by the basal ganglia to recruit and synchronize the activity of the cortical and subcortical structures required for the relevant processes.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaBrainAnimalsCerebellumCerebral CortexEmotionsHumansNeural PathwaysBasal gangliaCerebellumCortico-centricEmotional prosodySynchronization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.