ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2022
Frequency, Method, Intensity, and Health Sequelae of Sexual Choking Among U.S. Undergraduate and Graduate Students.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06602362 (Uncovering the Acute Neurobiological Significance of Emerging Sexual Behaviors), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Uncovering the Acute Neurobiological Significance of Emerging Sexual Behaviors
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- "And then I got strangled": Dangerous trends of sexual choking among young people.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Why Sexual Choking Is Not as Safe as You Think: A Call to Action from Sex Researchers and Kink Educators.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Review
- Experiences and Perceptions of Risk Among Australian Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Engage in Sexual Strangulation.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevalence and Demographic Correlates of "Rough Sex" Behaviors: Findings from a U.S. Nationally Representative Survey of Adults Ages 18-94 Years.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- The Association Between Sexual Victimization History and Consensual and Nonconsensual Rough Sex: Findings from a U.S. Nationally Representative Survey.Psychology of violence · 2025Article
- Association of blood biomarkers for neural injury with recent, frequent exposure to partnered sexual strangulation in young adult women.The journal of sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Choking/Strangulation During Sex: Understanding and Negotiating "Safety" Among 18-35 Year Old Australians.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Sexual Strangulation/Choking Among Australian 18-35 Year-Olds.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Acute blood biomarker responses to consensual sexual choking/strangulation in young adult women: a randomized crossover study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Sexual choking/strangulation and its association with condom and contraceptive use: Findings from a survey of students at a university in the Midwestern United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024Article
- Sexual desire for non-normative sexual behaviors: differences between centennials and millennials considering sexual orientation.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although sexual choking is now prevalent, little is known about how people engage in choking in terms of frequency, intensity, method, or potential health sequelae. In a campus-representative survey of undergraduate and graduate students, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence of ever having choked/been choked as part of sex; (2) examine the characteristics of choking one's sexual partners (e.g., age at first experience, number of partners, frequency, intensity, method); (3) examine the characteristics of having been choked during sex; and (4) assess immediate responses of having been choked including the extent to which frequency and method (e.g., hand, ligature, limb) of having been choked predicts the range of responses endorsed by participants. A total of 4254 randomly sampled students (2668 undergraduate, 1576 graduate) completed a confidential online survey during Spring 2021. The mean age of first choking/being choked was about 19, with more undergraduates than graduate students reporting first choking/being choked in adolescence. Women and transgender/gender non-binary participants were significantly more likely to have been choked than men. Participants more often reported the use of hands compared to limbs or ligature. Common responses to being choked were pleasurable sensations/euphoria (81.7%), a head rush (43.8%), feeling like they could not breathe (43.0%), difficulty swallowing (38.9%), unable to speak (37.6%), and watery eyes (37.2%). About 15% had noticed neck bruising and 3% had lost consciousness from being choked. Greater frequency and intensity of being choked was associated with reports of more physical responses as was use of limb (arm, leg) or ligature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.