Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902385›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2022

The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.

Keisuke Uemura, Masaki Takao, Yoshito Otake, Makoto Iwasa, Hidetoshi Hamada, Wataru Ando, Yoshinobu Sato, Nobuhiko Sugano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keisuke UemuraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan. surmountjp@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9245-1743
Masaki TakaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshito OtakeDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.
Makoto IwasaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetoshi HamadaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Wataru AndoDepartment of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinobu SatoDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.
Nobuhiko SuganoDepartment of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
The University of Osaka · JPNara Institute of Science and Technology · JPOsaka Gakuin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While accurate measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is essential in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and in evaluating the treatment of osteoporosis, it is unclear how region of interest (ROI) settings affect measurement of BMD at the total proximal femur region. In this study, we performed a simulation analysis to clarify the effect on BMD measurement of changing the ROI using hip computed tomography (CT) images of 75 females (mean age, 62.4 years). Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the proximal femur region were generated from CT images to calculate the change in BMD when the proximal boundary of the ROI was altered by 0-10 mm, and when the distal boundary of the ROI was altered by 0-30 mm. Further, changes in BMD were compared across BMD classification groups. A mean BMD increase of 0.62% was found for each 1-mm extension of the distal boundary. A mean BMD decrease of 0.18% was found for each 1-mm alteration of the proximal boundary. Comparing BMD classification groups, patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia demonstrated greater BMD changes than patients with normal BMD for the distal boundary (0.68%, 0.64%, and 0.54%, respectively) and patients with osteoporosis demonstrated greater BMD changes than patients with osteoporosis and normal BMD for the proximal boundary (0.37%, 0.13%, and 0.03%, respectively). In conclusion, our study found that a consistent ROI setting, especially on the distal boundary, is necessary for the accurate measurement of total proximal femur BMD. Based on the findings, we recommend confirming that the ROI setting shown on the BMD result form is consistent with changes in serial BMD.

Indexed as

Bone DensityOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonFemaleFemurHumansMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone mineral density (BMD)Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)HipQuantitative CT (QCT)Region of interest

Identifiers

PMID35902385
OpenAlexW4288425183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.