Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902278›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination.

Kristin Goddard, Ned Lewis, Bruce Fireman, Eric Weintraub, Tom Shimabukuro, Ousseny Zerbo, Thomas G Boyce, Matthew E Oster, Kayla E Hanson, James G Donahue and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 vaccines and blood glucose control: Friend or foe?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kristin GoddardKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Ned LewisKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Bruce FiremanKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Eric WeintraubImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Tom ShimabukuroImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Ousseny ZerboKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Thomas G BoyceMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.
Matthew E OsterImmunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kayla E HansonMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.
James G DonahueMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States.
Pat RossKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Allison NalewayCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States.
Jennifer C NelsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Bruno LewinResearch and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Jason M GlanzInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, United States.
Joshua T B WilliamsAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health & Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, United States.
Elyse O KharbandaHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
W Katherine YihHarvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Nicola P KleinKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States. Electronic address: Nicola.Klein@kp.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence indicates that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is associated with risk of myocarditis and possibly pericarditis, especially in young males. It is not clear if risk differs between mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2. We assessed if risk differs using comprehensive health records on a diverse population.

methodsMembers 18-39 years of age at eight integrated healthcare-delivery systems were monitored using data updated weekly and supplemented with medical record review of myocarditis and pericarditis cases. Incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis events that occurred among vaccine recipients 0 to 7 days after either dose 1 or 2 of a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was compared with that of vaccinated concurrent comparators who, on the same calendar day, had received their most recent dose 22 to 42 days earlier. Rate ratios (RRs) were estimated by conditional Poisson regression, adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, health plan, and calendar day. Head-to-head comparison directly assessed risk following mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 during 0-7 days post-vaccination.

resultsFrom December 14, 2020 - January 15, 2022 there were 41 cases after 2,891,498 doses of BNT162b2 and 38 cases after 1,803,267 doses of mRNA-1273. Cases had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Most were hospitalized for ≤1 day; none required intensive care. During days 0-7 after dose 2 of BNT162b2, the incidence was 14.3 (CI: 6.5-34.9) times higher than the comparison interval, amounting to 22.4 excess cases per million doses; after mRNA-1273 the incidence was 18.8 (CI: 6.7-64.9) times higher than the comparison interval, amounting to 31.2 excess cases per million doses. In head-to-head comparisons 0-7 days after either dose, risk was moderately higher after mRNA-1273 than after BNT162b2 (RR: 1.61, CI 1.02-2.54).

conclusionsBoth vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in 18-39-year-olds. Risk estimates were modestly higher after mRNA-1273 than after BNT162b2.

Indexed as

2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19MyocarditisPericarditisHumansMaleRNA, MessengerVaccination2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineRNA, MessengerCOVID-19Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccinesMyocarditisPericarditisRapid cycle analysisRelative vaccine safetySARS-CoV2Vaccine safetyVaccine Safety Datalink

Identifiers

PMID35902278
PMCPMC9273527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.