Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902203›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2022

Community-based doulas for migrant and refugee women: a mixed-method systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Sarah Min-Lee Khaw, Rana Islamiah Zahroh, Kerryn O'Rourke, Red Dearnley, Caroline Homer, Meghan A Bohren

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Birth Equity and Maternal Health Among Immigrant Communities in the United States: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Min-Lee KhawCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia khaw@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0748-7961
Rana Islamiah ZahrohCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7831-2336
Kerryn O'RourkeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3496-3967
Red DearnleyBirth for Humankind, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9770-0430
Caroline HomerChild and Adolescent Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-3011
Meghan A BohrenCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4179-4682
The University of Melbourne · AUBurnet Institute · AULa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based doulas share the same cultural, linguistic, ethnic backgrounds or social experiences as the women they support. Community-based doulas may be able to bridge gaps for migrant and refugee women in maternity settings in high-income countries (HICs). The aim of this review was to explore key stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of community-based doula programmes for migrant and refugee women during labour and birth in HICs, and identify factors affecting implementation and sustainability of such programmes.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-method systematic review, searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase and grey literature databases from inception to 20th January 2022. Primary qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies focusing on stakeholders' perspectives and experiences of community-based doula support during labour and birth in any HIC and any type of health facility were eligible for inclusion. We used a narrative synthesis approach to analysis and GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in qualitative findings.

resultsTwelve included studies were from four countries (USA, Sweden, England and Australia). There were 26 findings categorised under three domains: (1) community-based doulas' role in increasing capacity of existing maternity services; (2) impact on migrant and refugee women's experiences and health; and (3) factors associated with implementing and sustaining a community-based doula programme.

conclusionCommunity-based doula programmes can provide culturally-responsive care to migrant and refugee women in HICs. These findings can inform community-based doula organisations, maternity healthcare services and policymakers. Further exploration of the factors that impact programme implementation, sustainability, strategic partnership potential and possible wider-reaching benefits is needed.

Indexed as

DoulasLabor, ObstetricRefugeesTransients and MigrantsFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancymaternal healthobstetricspublic Healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35902203
PMCPMC9341177
OpenAlexW4288459489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.