Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35902073›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2022

Environmental Degradation of Microplastics: How to Measure Fragmentation Rates to Secondary Micro- and Nanoplastic Fragments and Dissociation into Dissolved Organics.

Patrizia Pfohl, Marion Wagner, Lars Meyer, Prado Domercq, Antonia Praetorius, Thorsten Hüffer, Thilo Hofmann, Wendel Wohlleben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrizia PfohlBASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany.
Marion WagnerBASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany.
Lars MeyerBASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany.
Prado DomercqDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden.
Antonia PraetoriusInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GE, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0197-0116
Thorsten HüfferDepartment of Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, Vienna 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5639-8789
Thilo HofmannDepartment of Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, Vienna 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8929-6933
Wendel WohllebenBASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2094-3260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the environmental fate of microplastics is essential for their risk assessment. It is essential to differentiate size classes and degradation states. Still, insights into fragmentation and degradation mechanisms of primary and secondary microplastics into micro- and nanoplastic fragments and other degradation products are limited. Here, we present an adapted NanoRelease protocol for a UV-dose-dependent assessment and size-selective quantification of the release of micro- and nanoplastic fragments down to 10 nm and demonstrate its applicability for polyamide and thermoplastic polyurethanes. The tested cryo-milled polymers do not originate from actual consumer products but are handled in industry and are therefore representative of polydisperse microplastics occurring in the environment. The protocol is suitable for various types of microplastic polymers, and the measured rates can serve to parameterize mechanistic fragmentation models. We also found that primary microplastics matched the same ranking of weathering stability as their corresponding macroplastics and that dissolved organics constitute a major rate of microplastic mass loss. The results imply that previously formed micro- and nanoplastic fragments can further degrade into water-soluble organics with measurable rates that enable modeling approaches for all environmental compartments accessible to UV light.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringPlasticsWaterMicroplasticsPlasticsWaterWater Pollutants, Chemicaldegradation productsdose-dependentfragmentation ratesmicroplasticsnanoplasticssize-selective quantificationUV aging

Identifiers

PMID35902073
PMCPMC9387529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.