Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35901983›Full record

Trial reportBrain research bulletin2022

Pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of random nicotine delivery on cigarettes per day and smoke exposure.

Jessica M Yingst, Courtney Lester, Craig Livelsberger, Sophia I Allen, Erin Hammett, Susan Veldheer, Breianna Hummer, Candace Bordner, Junjia Zhu, Christopher N Sciamanna and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain research bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jessica M YingstPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. Electronic address: jyingst@phs.psu.edu.
Courtney LesterPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Craig LivelsbergerPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Sophia I AllenPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Erin HammettPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Susan VeldheerPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Breianna HummerPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Candace BordnerPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Junjia ZhuPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Christopher N SciamannaPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Neil TrushinPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Hock S TanBionex Pharmaceuticals LLC, North Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Stephen J WilsonPenn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Robert C TwiningMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jonathan FouldsPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Patricia Sue GrigsonPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Random nicotine delivery: A novel intervention for smokersR21DA038775 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI FOULDS, JONATHAN, GRIGSON, PATRICIA SUE · 2014 to 2015
$432k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany smokers report attempting to quit each year, yet most relapse, in part due to exposure to smoking-related cues. It is hypothesized that extinction of the cue-drug association could be facilitated through random nicotine delivery (RND), thus making it easier for smokers to quit. The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of RND on smoking cessation-related outcomes including cigarettes per day (CPD) and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO).

methodsParticipants were current smokers (>9 CPD) interested in quitting. Novel trans-mucosal, orally dissolving nicotine films, developed by Bionex Pharmaceuticals, were used in the study. The pharmacokinetic profile of these films was assessed in single (Experiment 1) and multiple-dose (Experiment 2) administrations prior to the smoking cessation study (Experiment 3). In Experiment 3, participants were randomized 1:1:1 to recieve 4 nicotine films per day of either: placebo delivery (0 mg), steady-state delivery (2 mg), or random nicotine delivery (RND) (0 mg or 4 mg). After two weeks, participants were advised to quit (target quit date, TQD) and were followed up 4 weeks later to collect CPD and CO and to measure dependence (Penn State Cigarette Dependence Index; PSCDI) and craving (Questionnaire of Smoking Urges; QSU-Brief). Means and frequencies were used to describe the data and repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine differences between groups.

resultsThe pharmacokinetic studies (Experiment 1 and 2) demonstrated that the films designed for this study delivered nicotine as expected, with the 4 mg film delivering a nicotine boost of approximately 12.4 ng/mL across both the single and the multiple dose administration studies. The films reduced craving for a cigarette and were well-tolerated, overall, and caused no changes in blood pressure or heart rate. Using these films in the cessation study (Experiment 3) (n = 45), there was a significant overall reduction in cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) and in exhaled CO, with no significant differences across groups (placebo, steady-state, RND). In addition, there were no group differences in dependence or craving. Adverse events included heartburn, hiccups, nausea, and to a lesser extent, vomiting and anxiety and there were no differences across groups.

conclusionOverall, this pilot study found that RND via orally dissolving films was feasible and well tolerated by participants. However, RND participants did not experience a greater reduction in self-reported CPD and exhaled CO, compared with participants in the steady-state and placebo delivery groups. Future studies to evaluate optimal RND parameters with larger sample sizes are needed to fully understand the effect of RND on smoking cessation-related outcomes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsHumansNicotinePilot ProjectsSmokeNicotineSmokeNicotine deliveryNicotine filmNicotine replacement therapyPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35901983
PMCPMC9743484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.