Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35901959›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2023

SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.

Miles McGibbon, Sam Money-Kyrle, Vincent Blay, Douglas R Houston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CACHE Challenge #2: Targeting the RNA Site of the SARS-CoV-2 Helicase Nsp13.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. RankMHC: Learning to Rank Class-I Peptide-MHC Structural Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miles McGibbonInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, UK.
Sam Money-KyrleInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, UK.
Vincent BlayDepartment of Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA; Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I(2)SysBio), Universitat de València and Spanish Research Council (CSIC), 46980 Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: vroger@ucsc.edu.
Douglas R HoustonInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, UK. Electronic address: DouglasR.Houston@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe discovery of a new drug is a costly and lengthy endeavour. The computational prediction of which small molecules can bind to a protein target can accelerate this process if the predictions are fast and accurate enough. Recent machine-learning scoring functions re-evaluate the output of molecular docking to achieve more accurate predictions. However, previous scoring functions were trained on crystalised protein-ligand complexes and datasets of decoys. The limited availability of crystal structures and biases in the decoy datasets can lower the performance of scoring functions.

objectivesTo address key limitations of previous scoring functions and thus improve the predictive performance of structure-based virtual screening.

methodsA novel machine-learning scoring function was created, named SCORCH (Scoring COnsensus for RMSD-based Classification of Hits). To develop SCORCH, training data is augmented by considering multiple ligand poses and labelling poses based on their RMSD from the native pose. Decoy bias is addressed by generating property-matched decoys for each ligand and using the same methodology for preparing and docking decoys and ligands. A consensus of 3 different machine learning approaches is also used to improve performance.

resultsWe find that multi-pose augmentation in SCORCH improves its docking power and screening power on independent benchmark datasets. SCORCH outperforms an equivalent scoring function trained on single poses, with a 1 % enrichment factor (EF) of 13.78 vs. 10.86 on 18 DEKOIS 2.0 targets and a mean native pose rank of 5.9 vs 30.4 on CSAR 2014. Additionally, SCORCH outperforms widely used scoring functions in virtual screening and pose prediction on independent benchmark datasets.

conclusionBy rationally addressing key limitations of previous scoring functions, SCORCH improves the performance of virtual screening. SCORCH also provides an estimate of its uncertainty, which can help reduce the cost and time required for drug discovery.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteinsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingUncertaintyLigandsProteinsDockingDrug discoveryMachine learningNeural networksScoringVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35901959
PMCPMC10105235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.