ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2022
Ab-initio contrast estimation and denoising of cryo-EM images.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fast Rigid Alignment of Heterogeneous Images in Sliced Wasserstein Distance.SIAM journal on imaging sciences · 2026Article
- Two datasets are better than one: method of double moments for 3D reconstruction in cryo-EM.Inverse problems · 2026Article
- Subspace Method of Moments forSIAM journal on imaging sciences · 2026Article
- Cryo-EM heterogeneity analysis using regularized covariance estimation and kernel regression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Cryo-EM Heterogeneity Analysis using Regularized Covariance Estimation and Kernel Regression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Computational methods forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Fast principal component analysis for cryo-electron microscopy images.Biological imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe contrast of cryo-EM images varies from one to another, primarily due to the uneven thickness of the ice layer. This contrast variation can affect the quality of 2-D class averaging, 3-D ab-initio modeling, and 3-D heterogeneity analysis. Contrast estimation is currently performed during 3-D iterative refinement. As a result, the estimates are not available at the earlier computational stages of class averaging and ab-initio modeling. This paper aims to solve the contrast estimation problem directly from the picked particle images in the ab-initio stage, without estimating the 3-D volume, image rotations, or class averages.
methodsThe key observation underlying our analysis is that the 2-D covariance matrix of the raw images is related to the covariance of the underlying clean images, the noise variance, and the contrast variability between images. We show that the contrast variability can be derived from the 2-D covariance matrix and we apply the existing Covariance Wiener Filtering (CWF) framework to estimate it. We also demonstrate a modification of CWF to estimate the contrast of individual images.
resultsOur method improves the contrast estimation by a large margin, compared to the previous CWF method. Its estimation accuracy is often comparable to that of an oracle that knows the ground truth covariance of the clean images. The more accurate contrast estimation also improves the quality of image restoration as demonstrated in both synthetic and experimental datasets.
conclusionsThis paper proposes an effective method for contrast estimation directly from noisy images without using any 3-D volume information. It enables contrast correction in the earlier stage of single particle analysis, and may improve the accuracy of downstream processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.