ArticleMedical physics2022
Estimation of undistorted images in brain echo-planar images with distortions using the conjugate gradient method with anatomical regularization.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAlthough echo-planar imaging (EPI) is widely used for diffusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, EPI images suffer from susceptibility-induced geometric distortions. We herein propose a new estimation method for undistorted EPI images using anatomical T
methodsOur proposed method estimates the undistorted EPI image in the image domain while estimating the magnetic field inhomogeneity map using the conjugate gradient method with anatomical regularization. Our method synthesizes the distorted image to match the measured EPI image containing geometric distortions by alternately updating the undistorted EPI image and the magnetic field inhomogeneity map. We evaluated our proposed method and compared it with a nonrigid registration-based distortion correction method using simulated data and using real data. In the evaluation of the estimation of the magnetic field inhomogeneity map, we used the normalized root-mean-squared error (NRMSE) between the estimated results and the ground truth. In the evaluation of the estimation of undistorted images, we used mutual information (MI) between the undistorted EPI image and the anatomical T
resultsUsing the simulated data, the means and standard deviations of the NRMSE values in the nonrigid registration-based method and proposed method were 1.29 ± 0.63 and 0.64 ± 0.30, respectively. The MI values in the proposed method were larger than those in the nonrigid registration-based method in all evaluated slices. For the real data, the proposed method improved the distortion, and the MI values in the proposed method were larger than those in the nonrigid registration-based method. In the estimation of the magnetic field inhomogeneity map, the NRMSE values in our method were smaller than those in the nonrigid registration-based method.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that our proposed method can estimate the regions with compressed distortions that are not well represented by the nonrigid registration-based methods. The results suggest that the proposed method could be useful in analyses combining EPI images with T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.