Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35901330›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022

Salvage Treatment and Outcomes of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer after Failed Concurrent Chemoradiation with or without Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Post Hoc Data Analysis from the ACTLACC Trial.

Tussawan Asakij, Jakkapan Khunnarong, Siriwan Tangjitgamol, Kanisa Rongsriyam, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul, Chokaew Tovanabutra, Kannika Paengchit, Jirasak Sukhaboon, Lieutenant Col Apiradee Kridakara, Thiti Atjimakul and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tussawan AsakijRadiation Oncology Section, Lampang Cancer Hospital, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3906-9980
Jakkapan KhunnarongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-1346
Siriwan TangjitgamolWomen's Health Center, MedPark Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000000153678884
Kanisa RongsriyamDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9785-1201
Ekkasit TharavichitkulDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Chokaew TovanabutraRadiation Oncology Section, Chonburi Cancer Hospital, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2589-8470
Kannika PaengchitGynecologic Oncology section, Lampang Cancer Hospital, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2369-6106
Jirasak SukhaboonRadiation Oncology Section, Lopburi Cancer Hospital, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4892-0645
Lieutenant Col Apiradee KridakaraRadiation Oncology Section, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-5052
Thiti AtjimakulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3460-8236
Piyawan PariyawateekulObstetrics and Gynecology Section, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-6537
Prapai TanprasertObstetrics and Gynecology Section, Rajburi Hospital, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9237-7539
Bangkok Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the type of salvage treatment and outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who failed treatment with concurrent chemoradiation with or without adjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsThis was post hoc analyses of data from the randomized trial which included 259 patients who had FIGO stage IIB-IVA and had either pelvic radiation therapy concurrent with cisplatin followed by observation or paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Data of the patients who failed primary treatment were collected: type of salvage treatments, time to progress after salvage therapy, progression-free (PFS) and overall survivals (OS).

resultsAfter primary treatment, 85 patients had either persistence (36.5%), progression (18.8%), or recurrences (44.7%). The sites of failure were loco/regional in 52.9%, systemic failure in 30.6%, and loco-regional and systemic in 16.5%. Chemotherapy was given in 51.8%, being the sole therapy in 34.1%. Majority were combination agents (31.8%), with paclitaxel/carboplatin as the most common regimen. Radiation to the metastatic sites along with chemotherapy was used in 14.1% whereas palliative radiation therapy or supportive care was used in approximately 10% of each. The median time from the start of salvage treatment to progression was 9.2 months (range 0.2-64.0 months) with median PFS of 11.2 months (95% CI, 7.2-15.3 months). Median overall survival 27.3 months (95% CI, 4.4-69.6 months).

conclusionsChemotherapy, either alone or with radiation therapy, was the most common salvage treatment in LACC after failure from primary treatment. The time to progress and PFS were less than 1 year with OS of approximately 2 years.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinFemaleHumansPaclitaxelRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeCarboplatinCisplatinPaclitaxelAdjuvant chemotherapyConcurrent chemoradiation therapylocally advanced cervical cancerSalvage therapy

Identifiers

PMID35901330
PMCPMC9727368
OpenAlexW4288388860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.