Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35901051›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Palaeolithic polyhedrons, spheroids and bolas over time and space.

Julia Cabanès, Antony Borel, Javier Baena Preysler, Antoine Lourdeau, Marie-Hélène Moncel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia CabanèsDépartement Homme et Environnement, Histoire Naturelle de l'Homme Préhistorique, HNHP‑UMR 7194 (MNHN, CNRS, UPVD), Alliance Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5900-4135
Antony BorelDépartement Homme et Environnement, Histoire Naturelle de l'Homme Préhistorique, HNHP‑UMR 7194 (MNHN, CNRS, UPVD), Alliance Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-1863
Javier Baena PreyslerDepartment of Prehistory and Archaeology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Antoine LourdeauDépartement Homme et Environnement, Histoire Naturelle de l'Homme Préhistorique, HNHP‑UMR 7194 (MNHN, CNRS, UPVD), Alliance Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, France.
Marie-Hélène MoncelDépartement Homme et Environnement, Histoire Naturelle de l'Homme Préhistorique, HNHP‑UMR 7194 (MNHN, CNRS, UPVD), Alliance Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyhedrons, spheroids and bolas (PSBs) are present in lithic series from the Lower Palaeolithic onwards and are found in several regions of the world. Nevertheless, very little is known about them. We propose here to summarise, illustrate and discuss the current state of our knowledge about these artefacts. Based on the available data in the literature and on our observations of several collections, we set up a database comprising 169 Palaeolithic assemblages with PSBs. Thanks to the statistical analysis of these data, we aim to highlight potential relationships between PSB characteristics (e.g., quantity, raw material) and assemblage composition and context, according to regions and chrono-cultural attributions. We also aim to discuss the question of artefacts from possible independent local histories, especially in Northwest Europe, where these objects are scarce. Our study concludes that hard stones (stones with high resistance to a physical constraint) available locally were generally selected to produce PSBs. Soft sedimentary rocks are suitable for their manufacture, and were selected too, whereas siliceous materials were left aside. We hypothesise that the scarcity of PSBs in Northwest Europe could result from a combination of cultural and environmental factors: it could be part of a regional tradition, influenced by the abundance of siliceous materials in the environment. In this region where the lithic production is widely made of flint, even though other materials were available, objects made from hard stones are scarce, resulting in a toolkit with only rare PSBs and cleavers. Was flint too brittle for the functions of PSBs? Raw materials of PSBs are often similar to those of heavy-duty tools in assemblages, which could provide other clues about their functions (e.g., tasks requiring a resistance to shocks). It is possible that their raw materials partly conditioned their final shape. PSBs can comprise a wide variety of artefacts, that for some could have change of status (e.g., from cores to percussive tools), diffused, adapted but also reinvented over two million years.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyEurope

Identifiers

PMID35901051
PMCPMC9333226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.