Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35900989›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Optimum stratum boundaries and sample sizes for Covid-19 data in Egypt.

Fatma S Abo El Hassan, Ramadan Hamed, Elham A Ismail, Safia M Ezzat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatma S Abo El HassanStatistics Dept, Faculty of Commerce, Al-Azhar University, Girls' Branch, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-0349
Ramadan HamedStatistics Dept, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Elham A IsmailStatistics Dept, Faculty of Commerce, Al-Azhar University, Girls' Branch, Cairo, Egypt.
Safia M EzzatStatistics Dept, Faculty of Commerce, Al-Azhar University, Girls' Branch, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stratified random sampling is an effective sampling technique for estimating the population characteristics. The determination of strata boundaries and the allocation of sample size to the strata are two of the most critical factors in maximizing the precision of the estimates. Most surveys are conducted in an environment of severe budget constraints and a specific time is required to finish the survey. So cost and time are two important objectives that are taken under consideration in most surveys. The study suggested Mathematical goal programming model for determining optimum stratum boundaries for an exponential study variable under multiple objectives model when cost and time are under consideration. Compared to other techniques, Goal programming has many advantages in resources planning. Determining the required resources to satisfy the desired goals and the effectiveness of the available resources as well as providing best solutions under different amounts of resources are examples of the advantages of Goal programming. In addition the paper used data on Covid-19 to evaluate the performance of the suggested model for the exponential distribution. The study divided the number of new cases diseases into small, medium and high numbers. It also compared the results with the findings in the reports of the World Health Organization. The suggested mathematical goal programming revealed that Egypt was exposed to three waves of infection during the interval (5/3/2020 to 12/8/2021). These results are identical to the actual reality of covid-19 waves in Egypt.

Indexed as

COVID-19Data CollectionEgyptHumansResearch DesignSample Size

Identifiers

PMID35900989
PMCPMC9333231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.