Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35900980›Full record

ReviewPloS one2022

A burning issue: Reviewing the socio-demographic and environmental justice aspects of the wildfire literature.

Alyssa S Thomas, Francisco J Escobedo, Matthew R Sloggy, José J Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Wildland Fire Smoke PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measuring long-term exposure to wildfire PMProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alyssa S ThomasUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1207-4344
Francisco J EscobedoUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9272-5046
Matthew R SloggyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, California, United States of America.
José J SánchezUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, California, United States of America.
Pacific Southwest Research Station · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Larger and more severe wildfires are becoming more frequent and impacting different communities and human settlements. Much of the scientific literature and media on wildfires has focused on area of ecosystems burned and numbers of structures destroyed. Equally unprecedented, but often less reported, are the increasing socioeconomic impacts different people and communities face from wildfires. Such information seems to indicate an emerging need to account for wildfire effects on peri-urban or wildland urban interface (WUI) areas, newer socio-demographic groups, and disadvantaged communities. To address this, we reviewed the socio-demographic dimensions of the wildfire literature using an environmental justice (EJ) lens. Specifically using a literature review of wildfires, human communities, social vulnerability, and homeowner mitigation, we conducted bibliometric and statistical analyses of 299 publications. The majority of publications were from the United States, followed by Canada and Australia, and most dealt with homeowner mitigation of risk, defensible space, and fuel treatments in WUI areas. Most publications studied the direct effects of wildfire related damage. Secondary impacts such as smoke, rural and urban communities, and the role of poverty and language were less studied. Based on a proposed wildfire-relevant EJ definition, the first EJ publication was in 2004, but the term was first used as a keyword in 2018. Studies in WUI communities statistically decreased the likelihood that a publication was EJ relevant. There was a significant relationship between EJ designation and inclusion of race/ethnicity and poverty variables in the study. Complexity across the various definitions of EJ suggest that it should not be used as a quantitative or binary metric; but as a lens to better understand socio-ecological impacts to diverse communities. We present a wildfire-relevant definition to potentially guide policy formulation and account for social and environmental justice issues.

Indexed as

FiresWildfiresDemographyEcosystemEnvironmental JusticeHumansSmokeUnited StatesSmoke

Identifiers

PMID35900980
PMCPMC9333234
OpenAlexW4288436425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.