ArticlePLoS biology2022
Neural responses in human superior temporal cortex support coding of voice representations.
Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Voice perception reflects graded sensitivity to acoustic cues along the auditory hierarchy.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Article
- Causal evidence from invasive recordings reveals distributed acoustic feature encoding underlying categorical voice perception.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Temporal Response Function-Driven Representational Similarity Analysis for Speech Perception Decoding with MEG and EEG.Biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Structural and pragmatic language skills in school-age children relate to resting state functional connectivity.Brain imaging and behavior · 2025Article
- Cortical processing of discrete prosodic patterns in continuous speech.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cortical-striatal brain network distinguishes deepfake from real speaker identity.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Functional connectivity across the human subcortical auditory system using an autoregressive matrix-Gaussian copula graphical model approach with partial correlations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Unveiling the development of human voice perception: Neurobiological mechanisms and pathophysiology.Current research in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Networks extracted from nonlinear fMRI connectivity exhibit unique spatial variation and enhanced sensitivity to differences between individuals with schizophrenia and controls.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
- Networks extracted from nonlinear fMRI connectivity exhibit unique spatial variation and enhanced sensitivity to differences between individuals with schizophrenia and controls.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Electrocorticography reveals the dynamics of famous voice responses in human fusiform gyrus.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- The effects of attention in auditory-visual integration revealed by time-varying networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- The path of voices in our brain.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- The Temporal Voice Areas are not "just" Speech Areas.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to recognize abstract features of voice during auditory perception is an intricate feat of human audition. For the listener, this occurs in near-automatic fashion to seamlessly extract complex cues from a highly variable auditory signal. Voice perception depends on specialized regions of auditory cortex, including superior temporal gyrus (STG) and superior temporal sulcus (STS). However, the nature of voice encoding at the cortical level remains poorly understood. We leverage intracerebral recordings across human auditory cortex during presentation of voice and nonvoice acoustic stimuli to examine voice encoding at the cortical level in 8 patient-participants undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation. We show that voice selectivity increases along the auditory hierarchy from supratemporal plane (STP) to the STG and STS. Results show accurate decoding of vocalizations from human auditory cortical activity even in the complete absence of linguistic content. These findings show an early, less-selective temporal window of neural activity in the STG and STS followed by a sustained, strongly voice-selective window. Encoding models demonstrate divergence in the encoding of acoustic features along the auditory hierarchy, wherein STG/STS responses are best explained by voice category and acoustics, as opposed to acoustic features of voice stimuli alone. This is in contrast to neural activity recorded from STP, in which responses were accounted for by acoustic features. These findings support a model of voice perception that engages categorical encoding mechanisms within STG and STS to facilitate feature extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.