Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35900405›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2023

Simulating traumatic brain injury

Raja Haseeb Basit, Jessica Wiseman, Farhana Chowdhury, Divya Maitreyi Chari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raja Haseeb BasitBradford Royal infirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire; Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jessica WisemanSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; Neural Tissue Engineering Keele Group, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Farhana ChowdhuryLabcorp Drug Development, Harrogate; Neural Tissue Engineering Keele Group, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Divya Maitreyi ChariNeural Tissue Engineering Keele Group, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Keele University · GBBradford Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injuries are serious clinical incidents associated with some of the poorest outcomes in neurological practice. Coupled with the limited regenerative capacity of the brain, this has significant implications for patients, carers, and healthcare systems, and the requirement for life-long care in some cases. Clinical treatment currently focuses on limiting the initial neural damage with long-term care/support from multidisciplinary teams. Therapies targeting neuroprotection and neural regeneration are not currently available but are the focus of intensive research. Biomaterial-based interventions are gaining popularity for a range of applications including biomolecule and drug delivery, and to function as cellular scaffolds. Experimental investigations into the development of such novel therapeutics for traumatic brain injury will be critically underpinned by the availability of appropriate high throughput, facile, ethically viable, and pathomimetic biological model systems. This represents a significant challenge for researchers given the pathological complexity of traumatic brain injury. Specifically, there is a concerted post-injury response mounted by multiple neural cell types which includes microglial activation and astroglial scarring with the expression of a range of growth inhibitory molecules and cytokines in the lesion environment. Here, we review common models used for the study of traumatic brain injury (ranging from live animal models to in vitro systems), focusing on penetrating traumatic brain injury models. We discuss their relative advantages and drawbacks for the developmental testing of biomaterial-based therapies.

Indexed as

astroglial scarbiomaterialcortical culturein vitromicroglial infiltrationmodelmulticellular modelpenetrating injuryscaffoldtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID35900405
PMCPMC9396524
OpenAlexW4285724898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.