Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35900023›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022

Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants.

Rui Yin, Brandon Y Feng, Amitabh Varshney, Brian G Pierce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ensembles ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Peptide-protein docking: from physics-based models to generative intelligence.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  16. G protein GαThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mapping targetable sites on the human surfaceome for the design of novel binders.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rui YinInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Brandon Y FengDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Amitabh VarshneyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Brian G PierceInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4821-0368

Funding

High resolution modeling and design of immune recognitionR35GM144083 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Brian G. Pierce · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
High Resolution Modeling and Design of T-Cell ReceptorsR01GM126299 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PIERCE, BRIAN G. · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126299NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM144083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution experimental structural determination of protein-protein interactions has led to valuable mechanistic insights, yet due to the massive number of interactions and experimental limitations there is a need for computational methods that can accurately model their structures. Here we explore the use of the recently developed deep learning method, AlphaFold, to predict structures of protein complexes from sequence. With a benchmark of 152 diverse heterodimeric protein complexes, multiple implementations and parameters of AlphaFold were tested for accuracy. Remarkably, many cases (43%) had near-native models (medium or high critical assessment of predicted interactions accuracy) generated as top-ranked predictions by AlphaFold, greatly surpassing the performance of unbound protein-protein docking (9% success rate for near-native top-ranked models), however AlphaFold modeling of antibody-antigen complexes within our set was unsuccessful. We identified sequence and structural features associated with lack of AlphaFold success, and we also investigated the impact of multiple sequence alignment input. Benchmarking of a multimer-optimized version of AlphaFold (AlphaFold-Multimer) with a set of recently released antibody-antigen structures confirmed a low rate of success for antibody-antigen complexes (11% success), and we found that T cell receptor-antigen complexes are likewise not accurately modeled by that algorithm, showing that adaptive immune recognition poses a challenge for the current AlphaFold algorithm and model. Overall, our study demonstrates that end-to-end deep learning can accurately model many transient protein complexes, and highlights areas of improvement for future developments to reliably model any protein-protein interaction of interest.

Indexed as

ProteinsAlgorithmsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationSequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID35900023
PMCPMC9278006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.