Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35899628›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2022

Biological sensitivities to high-resolution climate change projections in the California current marine ecosystem.

Jennifer M Sunday, Evan Howard, Samantha Siedlecki, Darren J Pilcher, Curtis Deutsch, Parker MacCready, Jan Newton, Terrie Klinger

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Groundfish biodiversity change in northeastern Pacific waters under projected warming and deoxygenation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer M SundayDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-040X
Evan HowardDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1993-0692
Samantha SiedleckiDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5662-7326
Darren J PilcherCooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0763-3236
Curtis DeutschDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-0797
Parker MacCreadySchool of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8070-8062
Jan NewtonApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2551-1830
Terrie KlingerSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2430-0246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The California Current Marine Ecosystem is a highly productive system that exhibits strong natural variability and vulnerability to anthropogenic climate trends. Relating projections of ocean change to biological sensitivities requires detailed synthesis of experimental results. Here, we combine measured biological sensitivities with high-resolution climate projections of key variables (temperature, oxygen, and pCO

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemAnimalsCaliforniaFishesFood ChainOxygenOxygenCalifornia current marine ecosystemcarbon dioxideclimate changeoxygenphysiological sensitivityregional climate projectionsspecies vulnerabilitytemperature

Identifiers

PMID35899628
PMCPMC9542873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.