Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35899532›Full record

SynthesisPhysical therapy2022

Reliability of Muscle Strength and Muscle Power Assessments Using Isokinetic Dynamometry in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Danny R van der Woude, Thijs Ruyten, Bart Bartels

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physical therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07084376 (A Multicenter, Parallel-group, Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Two Different Educational Approaches on Intermittent Catheter-related Acceptance and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07084376 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Parallel-group, Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Two Different Educational Approaches on Intermittent Catheter-related Acceptance and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): RElax & feeL at EASE (RELEASE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorStefania MuscoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsIncontinence, Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction, Urinary RetentionArmsEnhanced Educational Program for Intermittent Catheterization, Standard Education Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modified Squat Test for Predicting Knee Muscle Strength in Older Adults.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2024
    Article
  17. Factors, mechanisms and improvement methods of muscle strength loss.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danny R van der WoudeChild Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Thijs RuytenChild Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Bart BartelsChild Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to critically appraise and summarize the evidence for reliability of muscle strength and muscle power assessment in patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) using isokinetic dynamometry.

methodsPubMed, CINAHL, and Embase electronic databases were searched from inception to March 8, 2022. Studies designed to evaluate reliability of muscle strength and power measurements using isokinetic dynamometry were included in this review. First, the methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidelines. Next, the quality of measurement properties was determined. Finally, the methodological quality and quality of measurement properties of the studies were combined to obtain a best-evidence synthesis.

resultsA best-evidence synthesis of reliability was performed in 11 studies including postpoliomyelitis syndrome (n = 5), hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (n = 2), motor neuron diseases (n = 1), myotonic dystrophy (n = 1), and groups of pooled NMDs (n = 2). A best-evidence synthesis on measurement error could not be performed. Quality of evidence on reliability ranged from high in postpoliomyelitis syndrome to very low in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy, motor neuron diseases, and groups of pooled NMDs. The most frequently used outcome measure was peak torque, which was reliable in all populations (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.7).

conclusionThe quality of evidence for reliability of isokinetic dynamometry was found to vary substantially among different NMDs. High quality of evidence has been obtained only in patients with postpoliomyelitis syndrome. Further research is needed in the majority of known NMDs to determine reliability and validity of isokinetic dynamometry. IMPACT: The ability of isokinetic dynamometers to capture clinically relevant changes in muscle strength and muscle power in NMDs remains unclear. Isokinetic dynamometry results in NMDs should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Hereditary Sensory and Motor NeuropathyNeuromuscular DiseasesPostpoliomyelitis SyndromeHumansMusclesMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscle Strength DynamometerReproducibility of ResultsMuscle StrengthMuscle Strength DynamometerMuscle WeaknessNeuromuscular DiseasesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35899532
PMCPMC10071497
OpenAlexW4288080516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.