ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022
Optimization of trial duration to predict long-term HbA1c change with therapy: A pharmacometrics simulation-based evaluation.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the Effects of Nanocurcumin Supplementation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Model-Informed Approaches for Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Evidence Generation: Insights from a Model-Based Longitudinal HbA1c Meta-Analysis from EMA Marketing Authorization Applications.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- A Review of Semi-Mechanistic HbA1c Models in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Strengths, Limitations, and Applications.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Four Semi-Mechanistic Models for Predicting Glycemic Control With a Glucagon Receptor Antagonist in People With Type 2 Diabetes.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Chinese Clinical Trial Registry 13-year data collection and analysis: geographic distribution, financial support, research phase, duration, and disease categories.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Optimization of trial duration to predict long-term HbA1c change with therapy: A pharmacometrics simulation-based evaluation.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the main biomarker of diabetes drug development. However, because of its delayed turnover, trial duration is rarely shorter than 12 weeks, and being able to predict long-term HbA1c with precision using data from shorter studies would be beneficial. The feasibility of reducing study duration was therefore investigated in this study, assuming a model-based analysis. The aim was to investigate the predictive performance of 24- and 52-week extrapolations using data from up to 4, 6, 8 or 12 weeks, with six previously published pharmacometric models of HbA1c. Predictive performance was assessed through simulation-based dose-response predictions and model averaging (MA) with two hypothetical drugs. Results were consistent across the methods of assessment, with MA supporting the results derived from the model-based framework. The models using mean plasma glucose (MPG) or nonlinear fasting plasma glucose (FPG) effect, driving the HbA1c formation, showed good predictive performance despite a reduced study duration. The models, using the linear effect of FPG to drive the HbA1c formation, were sensitive to the limited amount of data in the shorter studies. The MA with bootstrap demonstrated strongly that a 4-week study duration is insufficient for precise predictions of all models. Our findings suggest that if data are analyzed with a pharmacometric model with MPG or FPG with a nonlinear effect to drive HbA1c formation, a study duration of 8 weeks is sufficient with maintained accuracy and precision of dose-response predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.