Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35899256›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2022

Genome-wide analysis of hybridization in wild boar populations reveals adaptive introgression from domestic pig.

Nicolas Mary, Nathalie Iannuccelli, Geoffrey Petit, Nathalie Bonnet, Alain Pinton, Harmonie Barasc, Amélie Faure, Anne Calgaro, Vladimir Grosbois, Bertrand Servin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anthropogenic Change and the Process of Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicolas MaryGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-5555
Nathalie IannuccelliGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Geoffrey PetitASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE Montpellier France.
Nathalie BonnetGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Alain PintonGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Harmonie BarascGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Amélie FaureGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Anne CalgaroGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Vladimir GrosboisASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE Montpellier France.
Bertrand ServinGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Alain DucosGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.
Juliette RiquetGenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The admixture of domestic pig into French wild boar populations has been monitored since the 1980s thanks to the existence of a cytogenetic difference between the two sub-species. The number of chromosomes is 2

Indexed as

admixtureferal piggenetic monitoringgenotypingpopulation geneticsSus scrofaWildlife management

Identifiers

PMID35899256
PMCPMC9309462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.