ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Degradation Assessment of Poplar Shelterbelts in the Kubuqi Desert Using an Entropy Weight-TOPSIS-RSR Model.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Medical service performance evaluation of tertiary general hospitals in Sichuan Province in China based on diagnosis-related groups.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of technical support capacity for occupational disease surveillance and assessment of CDCs in Sichuan Province, China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of primary health care service capacity in China based on TOPSIS and RSR methods.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Regional differences in health resource allocation: a longitudinal study in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle, China.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Evaluation of inpatient services of tertiary comprehensive hospitals based on DRG payment.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of community basic public health service effect in a city in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region--based on entropy weight TOPSIS method and RSR fuzzy set.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as "good" or "poor." One of the laboratories was marked as "relatively poor" (A), two as "medium" (B and F), and four as "relatively good" (C, E, G, and D). In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.