Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35899151›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2022

Let's (Tik) Talk About Fitness Trends.

Valdemar Štajer, Ivana M Milovanović, Nikola Todorović, Marijana Ranisavljev, Saša Pišot, Patrik Drid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valdemar ŠtajerFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Ivana M MilovanovićFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Nikola TodorovićFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Marijana RanisavljevFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Saša PišotInstitute for Kinesiology Research, Science and Research Centre Koper, Koper, Slovenia.
Patrik DridFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several factors that follow the development of society affect physical inactivity, which primarily includes the development of technology and digitalization and the increasing choice of unhealthy lifestyle habits. However, certain shifts in the fitness industry have been noted in the last decade. The development of wearable technologies and artificial intelligence is one of the leading fitness trends and undoubtedly represents the future of the fitness industry. On the other hand, the significant influence of social media and networks affects the development and attitudes of people related to physical activity. Therefore, this review paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of wearable technologies and artificial intelligence, the positive and negative effects of social networks, and points out the problems accompanying these new fitness trends. The development of fitness trends follows humanity's needs, and one of the biggest challenges is incorporating these novelties in a mission to improve physical activity levels worldwide.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSocial MediaExerciseHumansSedentary BehaviorSocial Networkingmodern technologiesphysical activitysocial mediasocial networking platformwearable technologies

Identifiers

PMID35899151
PMCPMC9310012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.